Top & 2nd: Auto Classics on youtube.com
4th: planetcarsz.com
Bottom: Connaught Engineering
As human civilization begins to envision the end of an era dominated by the internal combustion engine, we take a look back at the masterworks and follies of the Automotive Century, detour onto the meandering two-lanes to visit a few roadside attractions, and comment on the architectural and urban planning consequences of car culture.
So perhaps knowing that orders for the 2300S coupe would soon end, OSI built a prototype coupe using the German Ford Taunus 20M 2 liter, 60 degree V6. An interesting choice, as the upcoming Fiat Dino was also a 2 liter V6, but a more powerful, complex design. When the OSI-Ford 20M TS went into production for 1967, it was in direct competition with the Fiat 2300S coupe, which OSI was still producing. Soon enough, the more powerful, 125 hp 2.3 liter Ford V6 was offered, which must have made Fiat management unhappy. The fastback lines of the new car were clean enough, with functional air extractor vents taking the place of decorative chrome. The front fender vents on the prototype shown here were deleted on most of the production cars.
…while comparing the rear views of the Fiat above with the OSI-Ford below reveals that the glassy greenhouse of the Fiat sits more happily on the lower body. Note that on the Fiat, the rear window meets the deck where the roof slope ends, providing good visibility to the rear as well as visual clarity (the designy kind). On the Ford the backlight ends too high for good rear vision, and the roof slope takes another window's-worth of space to reach the short, visually-indecisive horizontal surface of the deck. And as the side profile (3rd from top) reveals, the blunt front end and the roof proportions place visual weight over the front wheels rather than the rears, odd for a rear-drive, fastback design.
The grille enclosing the quad headlights is tidy, but looks like lots of other cars from the period. Still, the car was reasonably popular during its two-year production run, with at least 870 of the 2.0 liter model produced, and 409 of the 2.3 liter. Some sources claim that as many as 2,200 of the OSI-Ford were built, but the marque club's figure of around 200 survivors casts some doubt on the higher total. OSI produced at least one convertible prototype, and the top, when erected, seemed to have a happier relationship with the lower body. Sadly, the OSI facility closed after 1968, when production of the Fiat 2300S and its upstart competitor, the OSI-Ford, ended...
McQueen's original plan had been to share a Porsche 917 with Jackie Stewart in the race, but that had been nixed by McQueen's insurance company. And while McQueen and Sturges had originally planned the film as "Day of the Champion" with Warner Brothers, the project moved to Cinema Center Films as "Le Mans" when McQueen's multi-picture contract was cancelled after the studio was sold. While it wasn't unheard-of for filming to begin before a script was written (directors like Jean-Luc Godard bacame famous for avoiding scripts), the sheer size of the operation began to make Cinema Center nervous. Director Sturges disagreed with McQueen about how to proceed, and was replaced mid-project by Lee Katzin. During and after the actual 24-hour race, the story line remained unresolved. In lieu of a finished story, Katzin and the production crew threw their energies into solving technical problems. They mounted cameras on the front of their 908 camera car (McQueen's Sebring Porsche) with quick-release hardware for fast film changes, and mounted cameras outside the windshields and door windows on John Wyer's Gulf Team Porsches to get real-time driving portraits, like the one below. The vague story line of the fictional race called for Porsche to win, so Enzo Ferrari declined to cooperate with the filming, and the crew borrowed Ferrari 512s from privateer Jacques Swaters. Ironically, the Gulf Porsche team actually won the real race, a first for Porsche. That victory could've been described as going according to the script, except of course, there still wasn't any script…
The risks posed by the project went well beyond financial ones. McQueen insisted that the supplemental footage be filmed at racing speeds. What were those speeds? The big Porsche flat-12s and Ferrari V12s were hitting 230 mph on the long Mulsanne straight. The previous year, the winning Ford GT had averaged over 120 mph. During the downpour, three of Ferrari's contenders were taken out in a single accident, and another soon retired with mechanical damage. Luckily, no major injuries resulted, but later in the race, track marshal Jacques Argoud was killed when Ferrari driver Jacky Ickx crashed due to brake failure. During filming of supplemental scenes, the Solar Productions crew had more accidents. Pro drivers Derek Bell and David Piper were involved in separate accidents. Bell suffered burns and Piper lost a leg after an accident during a re-take that might have been avoided had there been a script. And McQueen had a wreck after driving co-star Elga Andersen to dinner; she was lightly injured and his personal assistant took the blame so the project could continue. This incident may have been more credible as story than the actual plot, involving Michael Delaney (McQueen ) and Lisa Belgetti (Andersen), the widow of a driver killed in an accident involving Delaney the previous year...
It's possibly a sign of the weakness of the plot line that the crash scenes are more believable than the interactions between Michael and Lisa. The crashes were filmed using obsolete racers, Lola T70s, re-bodied as Porsches and Ferraris. It seems the feminine contingent got all the thankless roles. For Elga the co-star, it was "convince us you're mesmerized by this incommunicative, distant guy." For Lola the car, it was "crash into this steel barrier over here…"
After that long-ago visit to Le Mans, my college pal took a photo of the Porsche 917K (Kurz, for short tail) that had won that rainy race 4 months earlier in the hands of Hans Herrmann and Richard Attwood. Herrmann immediately retired from racing. Car #23 had headed up a short parade of cars that survived the race, including a 917L (langheck for its long tail), and a Porsche 908 in 3rd ahead of 2 Ferraris. Only 16 cars (12 of them Porsches) out of 55 were running at the finish, and only 7 were officially classified due to minimum distance requirements.
In 8th place was the Solar Productions camera car, a Porsche 908 driven by Herbert Linge and Jonathan Williams. The production crew joked that if the car hadn't pitted so often to change film, they might've done better than taking 2nd in the 3 liter prototype class. That probably would not have consoled the studio, as the film was way over budget as well as behind schedule. Over a million feet of film had been shot, and McQueen had given up his salary and his percentage of any profits to finish his dream film. Eventually, two documentaries would be made about the filming. But evidence supporting McQueen's original documentary impulse precedes his riveting footage of live racing, and goes back to a movie released 5 days after his race at Sebring. Michael Wadleigh's documentary "Woodstock", also of a big spectacle nearly derailed by rain, cost $600,000 and made $50 million at the box office. "Le Mans" cost around $7.6 million (if you can ignore the personal cost of those accidents), and took in about $5.5 million.